Scientific Methods and Sacred Matters: On Methodological Naturalism, Divine Agency, and Christians in Science

This article critically analyzes the debate surrounding methodological naturalism (MN) within the context of scientific inquiry, focusing on the arguments put forth by Andrew Torrance on the one hand and John Perry and Sarah Lane Ritchie on the other. It begins with the medical mystery known as the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mallary, Mitchell (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Zygon
Year: 2024, Volume: 59, Issue: 3, Pages: 638–660
Further subjects:B Karl Barth
B Miracles
B Andrew Torrance
B Science and religion
B Methodological Naturalism
B Sarah Lane Ritchie
B anomalies
B John Perry
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1917283288
003 DE-627
005 20250506073847.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250214s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.16995/zygon.11761  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1917283288 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1917283288 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1356654010  |0 (DE-627)1917436971  |4 aut  |a Mallary, Mitchell 
109 |a Mallary, Mitchell  |a Mallary, Mitchell D.  |a Mallary, Mitch 
245 1 0 |a Scientific Methods and Sacred Matters: On Methodological Naturalism, Divine Agency, and Christians in Science 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article critically analyzes the debate surrounding methodological naturalism (MN) within the context of scientific inquiry, focusing on the arguments put forth by Andrew Torrance on the one hand and John Perry and Sarah Lane Ritchie on the other. It begins with the medical mystery known as the spontaneous remission of cancer—sometimes identified as a "miracle"—posing the question of how Christian medical researchers should approach this anomaly. Thereafter, I consider how Torrance’s rejection of MN, due to its perceived conflict with faith, would expect the Christian scientist to respond. Conversely, Perry and Ritchie defend MN, emphasizing its importance in maintaining scientific rigor and avoiding a "God of the gaps" approach. Subsequently, I demonstrate how both science and MN are conceived of differently between the two parties, indicating that this is primarily a semantic debate. Finally, after examining Torrance’s response to Perry and Ritchie, I propose a more nuanced approach, advocating for methodological flexibility wherein the nature of the question being asked determines the appropriate method one should employ. 
601 |a Methodologie 
601 |a Christian Science 
650 4 |a Andrew Torrance 
650 4 |a John Perry 
650 4 |a Karl Barth 
650 4 |a Methodological Naturalism 
650 4 |a Sarah Lane Ritchie 
650 4 |a anomalies 
650 4 |a Miracles 
650 4 |a Science and religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities, 1966  |g 59(2024), 3, Seite 638–660  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:59  |g year:2024  |g number:3  |g pages:638–660 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.16995/zygon.11761  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/id/11761/  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 466423483X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1917283288 
LOK |0 005 20250214111545 
LOK |0 008 250214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL