Love Affair with an Idea: Commentary on Wild Experiment: Feeling Science and Secularism after Darwin by Donovan Schaefer
In this review essay, I discuss how, in writing this book on how thinking is feeling, Donovan Schaefer is having a passionate love affair with an idea, how he pulls the bow string as far and still not enough to the point of breaking. I have three remarks/points of concern/comments specific to the ou...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2024
|
| Dans: |
Zygon
Année: 2024, Volume: 59, Numéro: 3, Pages: 825–838 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
thinking and feeling
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | In this review essay, I discuss how, in writing this book on how thinking is feeling, Donovan Schaefer is having a passionate love affair with an idea, how he pulls the bow string as far and still not enough to the point of breaking. I have three remarks/points of concern/comments specific to the outline of cogency theory. First, how thinking is feeling? If thinking is feeling is a process, how does it happen? Second, where does reframing science/knowledge as thinking is feeling take us? How can it reframe what we mean by science? And last, who is the thinking-feeling scientist-subject? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.16995/zygon.16909 |
