Conceptual plausibility and the rationality of theistic belief

In this article, I present a defence of conceptual plausibility, understood as an epistemic way to qualify concepts that situates them between the merely possible and the actual. To show that there is such a thing as conceptual plausibility, I rely on what seems to lie at the heart of many uses of t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silvestre, Ricardo Sousa (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Religious studies
Year: 2025, Volume: 61, Issue: 1, Pages: 109-128
Further subjects:B explanatory fruitfulness
B inductive plausibility
B Conceptual plausibility
B Concept of God
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1917504985
003 DE-627
005 20250219093937.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250218s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412523000471  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1917504985 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1917504985 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1249162165  |0 (DE-627)1785423797  |4 aut  |a Silvestre, Ricardo Sousa 
109 |a Silvestre, Ricardo Sousa  |a Silvestre Sousa, Ricardo  |a Silvestre, Ricardo S. 
245 1 0 |a Conceptual plausibility and the rationality of theistic belief 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article, I present a defence of conceptual plausibility, understood as an epistemic way to qualify concepts that situates them between the merely possible and the actual. To show that there is such a thing as conceptual plausibility, I rely on what seems to lie at the heart of many uses of the phrase ‘plausible concept’: explanatory fruitfulness. To make an effective case for the claim that conceptual plausibility is of philosophical interest, I present an argument based on the debate over the rationality of theistic belief and the concept of God. To show that conceptual plausibility is philosophically feasible, I first show that it cannot be reduced to propositional plausibility. Next, I offer a minimally precise characterization of conceptual plausibility; I approach this from a qualitative and comparative perspective as well. Finally, I show how these qualitative and comparative criteria of conceptual plausibility might be applied to the debate over the rationality of theistic belief and the concept of God. 
650 4 |a Conceptual plausibility 
650 4 |a Concept of God 
650 4 |a explanatory fruitfulness 
650 4 |a inductive plausibility 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 61(2025), 1, Seite 109-128  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:61  |g year:2025  |g number:1  |g pages:109-128 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412523000471  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/conceptual-plausibility-and-the-rationality-of-theistic-belief/DFC246ABAD22416382AF26D39B6F0296  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4666003320 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1917504985 
LOK |0 005 20250218152243 
LOK |0 008 250218||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL