What Counts as Religious/Spiritual Experience in the US and India?
Despite the acknowledged role of traditions and cultures in determining what counts as a religious or spiritual experience, many researchers nonetheless stipulate definitions of religion and/or spirituality that potentially obscure as much as they reveal. To test this, we formulated competing hypoth...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| In: |
The international journal for the psychology of religion
Jahr: 2025, Band: 35, Heft: 4, Seiten: 174-198 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Despite the acknowledged role of traditions and cultures in determining what counts as a religious or spiritual experience, many researchers nonetheless stipulate definitions of religion and/or spirituality that potentially obscure as much as they reveal. To test this, we formulated competing hypotheses based on definitions widely used in the scientific study of religion – a Tylorian spiritual agent hypothesis, a Jamesian self-transcendence hypothesis, and a Durkheimian variation hypothesis – that we explore by examining the extent to which religious and non-religious people in the US and India appraise specified items in the Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences as religious or spiritual (R/S). We found evidence for each of the hypotheses, which suggests the value of continuing to explore the variety of experiences that cultures and traditions appraise as R/S to better understand cross-cultural similarities and differences. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1532-7582 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: The international journal for the psychology of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2025.2523643 |
