Rethinking the ontological argument: a neoclassical theistic response
In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Book |
| Language: | English |
| Subito Delivery Service: | Order now. |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2006.
|
| In: | Year: 2006 |
| Reviews: | Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. By Daniel A. Dombrowski (2007) (Sturch, Richard, 1936 -)
Daniel A. Dombrowski, Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response (2007) (Viney, Donald Wayne) |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Ontological proof of God's existence
/ Religious philosophy
|
| Further subjects: | B
Theism
B Process theology B God ; Proof, Ontological B God Proof, Ontological |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
Print version: 9780521863698 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 883479427 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240202211348.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170130r20062006xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511498916 |c : ebook |9 978-0-511-49891-6 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)883479427 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)48274393X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBV883479427 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967420846 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967420846 | ||
| 035 | |a (CUP)CR9780511498916 | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)051600439 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b eng |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BD555 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 212/.1 | |
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a BN 3210 |2 rvk |0 (DE-625)rvk/13756: | ||
| 084 | |a 08.31 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 08.37 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)102597624X |0 (DE-627)725771208 |0 (DE-576)163801541 |4 aut |a Dombrowski, Daniel A. |d 1953- | |
| 109 | |a Dombrowski, Daniel A. 1953- |a Dombrowski, Daniel 1953- |a Dombrowski, Daniel Anthony 1953- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rethinking the ontological argument |b a neoclassical theistic response |c Daniel A. Dombrowski |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2006. | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (vii, 172 pages) |b digital, PDF file(s). | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 520 | |a In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this 2006 volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static. | ||
| 520 | |a Historical background -- Poetry versus the ontological argument: Richard Rorty's challenge -- Deconstructionism and the ontological argument: the case of Mark Taylor -- Is the ontological argument worthless? Graham Oppy's rejection -- Oppy, perfect islands, and existence as a predicate -- Rival concepts of God and the ontological argument: Thomas Morris, Katherin Rogers, and Alvin Plantinga | ||
| 534 | |c 2006 | ||
| 601 | |a Ontologie | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a God |x Proof, Ontological | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Process theology | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Process theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God ; Proof, Ontological | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4139857-9 |0 (DE-627)10440888X |0 (DE-576)20969789X |2 gnd |a Ontologischer Gottesbeweis |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049415-9 |0 (DE-627)104598581 |0 (DE-576)209081953 |2 gnd |a Religionsphilosophie |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-101 | |
| 776 | 1 | |z 9780521326353 |c paperback | |
| 776 | 1 | |z 9780521863698 | |
| 776 | 1 | |z 9780521863698 |c : hardback | |
| 776 | 1 | |z 9780521326353 |c : paperback | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |a Dombrowski, Daniel A., 1953 - |t Rethinking the ontological argument |b 1. publ. |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006 |h VII, 172 S. |w (DE-627)500622302 |w (DE-576)256404836 |z 0521863694 |z 9780521863698 |z 9780521326353 |k Non-Electronic |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version |z 9780521863698 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Rezensiert in |a Sturch, Richard, 1936 - |t Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. By Daniel A. Dombrowski |d 2007 |w (DE-627)1783721987 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Rezensiert in |a Viney, Donald Wayne |t Daniel A. Dombrowski, Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response |d 2007 |w (DE-627)1821423828 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |m X:CUP |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CHS | ||
| 935 | |i Blocktest | ||
| 936 | r | v | |a BN 3210 |b Natürliche Gotteserkenntnis, Gottesbeweise |k Theologie und Religionswissenschaften |k Dogmatik und Dogmengeschichte |k Spezielle Dogmatik |k Gotteslehre |k Systematische Einzelfragen |k Natürliche Gotteserkenntnis, Gottesbeweise |0 (DE-627)1270741144 |0 (DE-625)rvk/13756: |0 (DE-576)200741144 |
| 936 | b | k | |a 08.31 |j Metaphysik |j Ontologie |q SEPA |0 (DE-627)106402706 |
| 936 | b | k | |a 08.37 |j Religionsphilosophie |q SEPA |0 (DE-627)106405578 |
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4447005697 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 883479427 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240103203937 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240103||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21 |c DE-627 |d DE-21 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o k |p p | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a eBook-Cambridge-Gesamt-EBA-2024 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 85640 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |z Zugang für die Universität Tübingen | ||
| LOK | |0 912 |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ebok |a lbok | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheo_oa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Ontological proof of God's existence,Ontological argument,God's existence,Religious philosophy,Philosophy of religion,Religion |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Philosophie des religions,Preuve ontologique de l’existence de Dieu,Argument ontologique,Argument ontologique |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofía de religión,Prueba ontológica de la existencia de Dios |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofia della religione,Prova ontologica dell'esistenza di Dio,Argomento ontologico,Argomento ontologico |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教哲学,神存在的本体论论证,神存在的存有论论证 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教哲學,神存在的本體論論證,神存在的存有論論證 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofia da religião,Prova ontológica da existência de Deus |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Онтологическое доказательство существования Бога,Философия религии |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Οντολογική απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού,Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας |
| SUB | |a REL | ||