Origen’s Polemics in "Princ" 4.2.4: Scriptural Literalism as a Christo-Metaphysical Error
The relation between Books 1-3 and Book 4 of Origen’s Peri Archon has largely been left unspecified or denied. This is due to the apparent incongruence between the metaphysical discussions of the former section and the hermeneutical remarks of the latter. I argue that Origen’s threefold distinction...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2015
|
| Dans: |
Vigiliae Christianae
Année: 2015, Volume: 69, Numéro: 1, Pages: 30-69 |
| RelBib Classification: | HA Bible KAB Christianisme primitif VB Herméneutique; philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Origen
Peri Archon
Incarnation
Scripture
metaphysics
hermeneutics
polemics
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | The relation between Books 1-3 and Book 4 of Origen’s Peri Archon has largely been left unspecified or denied. This is due to the apparent incongruence between the metaphysical discussions of the former section and the hermeneutical remarks of the latter. I argue that Origen’s threefold distinction of Scripture in Princ 4.2.4 draws upon key metaphysical conclusions of the earlier sections to depict the metaphysical structure of inspired Scripture as analogous to the Incarnation, and that this insight constitutes Origen’s fundamental polemic against scriptural literalism, the common error of the two primary adversaries of the work (the “simple” of the Church and the Marcionites). Peri Archon is thus unified around the polemical purpose of defending Origen’s allegorical exegesis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0720 |
| Contient: | In: Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341182 |