Missional Theology’s Missing Ingredient
Features of the “missional” conversation revolve around discussions of the ecclesial and divine mission. Largely an intra-Evangelical debate, with relevance to other traditions, this conversation has lacked representation from systematic theology. This article argues that the aim for diversity and l...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2015
|
In: |
Mission studies
Year: 2015, Volume: 32, Issue: 3, Pages: 384-397 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Missions theology
/ Gospel
/ Systematic theology
|
RelBib Classification: | NAA Systematic theology RJ Mission; missiology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | Features of the “missional” conversation revolve around discussions of the ecclesial and divine mission. Largely an intra-Evangelical debate, with relevance to other traditions, this conversation has lacked representation from systematic theology. This article argues that the aim for diversity and listening to other voices that missiology excels at often stops short of seeing things as systematic theology might render them. The integrity of systematic theology’s voice as an exposition of the church’s confession renders structures that mark the manner of how gospel-exposition and mission really work insofar as the gospel defines things as they really are. As Christian theology claims Jesus’ lordship over all created realities, then, it functions to co-labor with the God of the Bible who is missionary and brings his people to participate in his action. Systematic theology then is missional in form, content, and aim, suggesting that mission is entirely what systematic theology is about. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-3831 |
Contains: | In: Mission studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15733831-12341416 |