Is Either/Or a Religious Work or Not?
In this article I raise the question of whether or not Kierkegaard’s earliest pseudonymous work, Either/Or, is a “religious” work, as he later claims in The Point of View for My Work as an Author. Contra Henning Fenger, Joakim Garff, and Alastair Hannay, I argue with Charles Bellinger, David Law, Ro...
| Published in: | Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2015
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
|
| RelBib Classification: | FA Theology KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | In this article I raise the question of whether or not Kierkegaard’s earliest pseudonymous work, Either/Or, is a “religious” work, as he later claims in The Point of View for My Work as an Author. Contra Henning Fenger, Joakim Garff, and Alastair Hannay, I argue with Charles Bellinger, David Law, Robert Perkins and Joel Rasmussen that Either/Or is in fact a religious work. After giving a definition of the term “religious,” I carry this out primarily by paying close attention to the text and secondarily by an examination of what kind of vocational approach to writing Either/Or evinces, a question which Law notes has not yet been adequately addressed in Kierkegaard studies |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1612-9792 |
| Contains: | In: Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2015-0109 |