An epistemic argument for tolerance
In this paper I first take a critical look at Grube’s allegiance to the idea that bivalence should be rejected as it can serve the cause of religious toleration. I argue that bivalence is not what Grube says it is, and that rejection of bivalence comes at a very high price that we should not be will...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 5, Pages: 428-435 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religion
/ Justification (Philosophy)
/ Religious tolerance
/ Bi-valence
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AX Inter-religious relations |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1544981597 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200226131041.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160719s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1544981597 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)474981592 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ474981592 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)173741355 |0 (DE-627)698646932 |0 (DE-576)134582233 |4 aut |a Woudenberg, René van |d 1957- | |
| 109 | |a Woudenberg, René van 1957- |a Van Woudenberg, René 1957- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 3 | |a An epistemic argument for tolerance |c René van Woudenberg, Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper I first take a critical look at Grube’s allegiance to the idea that bivalence should be rejected as it can serve the cause of religious toleration. I argue that bivalence is not what Grube says it is, and that rejection of bivalence comes at a very high price that we should not be willing to pay. Next I analyze Grube’s argument for religious toleration - an argument that does not involve the rejection of bivalence. I argue that the argument is unconvincing because there exists no relation between epistemic justification and toleration. (I also note problems with the notion of "justification" as used by Grube.) | ||
| 601 | |a Episteme | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 652 | |a AB:AX | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4138650-4 |0 (DE-627)10564109X |0 (DE-576)209687851 |2 gnd |a Rechtfertigung |g Philosophie |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4121582-5 |0 (DE-627)104279605 |0 (DE-576)209544414 |2 gnd |a Religiöse Toleranz |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1112753966 |0 (DE-627)86690056X |0 (DE-576)476751063 |2 gnd |a Bivalenz |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of philosophy and theology |d Abingdon : Taylor & Francis, 2013 |g 76(2015), 5, Seite 428-435 |w (DE-627)731333977 |w (DE-600)2692944-2 |w (DE-576)381569306 |x 2169-2327 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:76 |g year:2015 |g number:5 |g pages:428-435 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Grube, Dirk-Martin, 1959 - |t Justified religious difference |d 2016 |w (DE-627)1544980833 |w (DE-576)474980839 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Grube, Dirk-Martin, 1959 - |t Reply to the respondents to "Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity" |d 2016 |w (DE-627)1544982925 |w (DE-576)474982920 |
| 856 | |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315?needAccess=true&role=button |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2933686570 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1544981597 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20160829122843 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160719||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043253 |a AX | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Bi-valence,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion,Religious tolerance,Religious tolerance |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Bivalence,Religion,Religions,Religion,Tolérance religieuse,Tolérance religieuse |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Bivalencia,Religión,Religión,Religión,Tolerancia religiosa,Tolerancia religiosa |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Bivalenza,Religione,Religione,Religione,Tolleranza religiosa,Tolleranza religiosa |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 二值原理,宗教,宗教 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Bivalência,Religião,Religião,Tolerância religiosa,Tolerância religiosa |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Двухвалентность,Религиозная толерантность (мотив),Религиозная толерантность,Религия,Религия (мотив) |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Διδυναμία,Δισθενικότητα,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκευτική ανοχή (μοτίβο),Θρησκευτική ανοχή |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Zweiwertigkeit,Zweiwertigkeitsprinzip,Bivalenzprinzip,Prinzip der Zweiwertigkeit |