An epistemic argument for tolerance
In this paper I first take a critical look at Grube’s allegiance to the idea that bivalence should be rejected as it can serve the cause of religious toleration. I argue that bivalence is not what Grube says it is, and that rejection of bivalence comes at a very high price that we should not be will...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 5, Pages: 428-435 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religion
/ Justification (Philosophy)
/ Religious tolerance
/ Bi-valence
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AX Inter-religious relations |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |