Why be critical?: Introducing a symposium on "Capitalizing religion" : review symposium
This article introduces a review symposium on Craig Martin’s Capitalizing Religion: Ideology and the Opiate of the Bourgeoisie (2014). It provides a brief summary and situates Capitalizing Religion in relation to recent debates about what it means to engage in the "critical" study of relig...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[2016]
|
In: |
Religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 46, Issue: 3, Pages: 412-419 |
Review of: | Capitalizing religion (London [u.a.] : Bloomsbury Academic, 2014) (Engler, Steven)
|
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Science of Religion
/ Critical theory
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AD Sociology of religion; religious policy |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This article introduces a review symposium on Craig Martin’s Capitalizing Religion: Ideology and the Opiate of the Bourgeoisie (2014). It provides a brief summary and situates Capitalizing Religion in relation to recent debates about what it means to engage in the "critical" study of religion\s. The symposium consists of four commentaries: by Véronique Altglas (Queen’s University Belfast); Finbarr Curtis (Georgia Southern University); Sean McCloud (University of North Carolina at Charlotte); and Jörg Rüpke (Universität Erfurt). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0048-721X |
Reference: | Kritik in ""Capitalizing religion" (2016)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2016.1192831 |