Why be critical?: Introducing a symposium on "Capitalizing religion" : review symposium
This article introduces a review symposium on Craig Martin’s Capitalizing Religion: Ideology and the Opiate of the Bourgeoisie (2014). It provides a brief summary and situates Capitalizing Religion in relation to recent debates about what it means to engage in the "critical" study of relig...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[2016]
|
| In: |
Religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 46, Issue: 3, Pages: 412-419 |
| Review of: | Capitalizing religion (London [u.a.] : Bloomsbury Academic, 2014) (Engler, Steven)
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Science of Religion
/ Critical theory
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AD Sociology of religion; religious policy |
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This article introduces a review symposium on Craig Martin’s Capitalizing Religion: Ideology and the Opiate of the Bourgeoisie (2014). It provides a brief summary and situates Capitalizing Religion in relation to recent debates about what it means to engage in the "critical" study of religion\s. The symposium consists of four commentaries: by Véronique Altglas (Queen’s University Belfast); Finbarr Curtis (Georgia Southern University); Sean McCloud (University of North Carolina at Charlotte); and Jörg Rüpke (Universität Erfurt). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0048-721X |
| Reference: | Kritik in ""Capitalizing religion" (2016)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2016.1192831 |