Doing History the (W)right Way
This article argues that Wright’s historical method is neither modern nor postmodern though it does contain elements that are found in each. In it I assess Wright’s method in light of critique from Carey Newman on the one hand and Brian Walsh and Richard Middleton on the other. I conclude that all o...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2015
|
Dans: |
Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Année: 2015, Volume: 13, Numéro: 2/3, Pages: 328-346 |
RelBib Classification: | HC Nouveau Testament TK Époque contemporaine |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Abduction
critical realism
deduction
induction
modernism
postmodernism
scientific method
|
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Résumé: | This article argues that Wright’s historical method is neither modern nor postmodern though it does contain elements that are found in each. In it I assess Wright’s method in light of critique from Carey Newman on the one hand and Brian Walsh and Richard Middleton on the other. I conclude that all of them are partially correct and partially incorrect. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5197 |
Contient: | In: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455197-01302011 |