Doing History the (W)right Way
This article argues that Wright’s historical method is neither modern nor postmodern though it does contain elements that are found in each. In it I assess Wright’s method in light of critique from Carey Newman on the one hand and Brian Walsh and Richard Middleton on the other. I conclude that all o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2015
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Year: 2015, Volume: 13, Issue: 2/3, Pages: 328-346 |
| RelBib Classification: | HC New Testament TK Recent history |
| Further subjects: | B
Abduction
critical realism
deduction
induction
modernism
postmodernism
scientific method
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | This article argues that Wright’s historical method is neither modern nor postmodern though it does contain elements that are found in each. In it I assess Wright’s method in light of critique from Carey Newman on the one hand and Brian Walsh and Richard Middleton on the other. I conclude that all of them are partially correct and partially incorrect. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5197 |
| Contains: | In: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455197-01302011 |