Doing History the (W)right Way

This article argues that Wright’s historical method is neither modern nor postmodern though it does contain elements that are found in each. In it I assess Wright’s method in light of critique from Carey Newman on the one hand and Brian Walsh and Richard Middleton on the other. I conclude that all o...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Stewart, Robert B. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2015
Dans: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Année: 2015, Volume: 13, Numéro: 2/3, Pages: 328-346
RelBib Classification:HC Nouveau Testament
TK Époque contemporaine
Sujets non-standardisés:B Abduction critical realism deduction induction modernism postmodernism scientific method
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:This article argues that Wright’s historical method is neither modern nor postmodern though it does contain elements that are found in each. In it I assess Wright’s method in light of critique from Carey Newman on the one hand and Brian Walsh and Richard Middleton on the other. I conclude that all of them are partially correct and partially incorrect.
ISSN:1745-5197
Contient:In: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/17455197-01302011