A Matter of Perspective?: Disentangling the Emic-Etic Debate in the Scientific Study of Religion\s

This article introduces the emic–etic debate in the scientific study of religion\s and provides a frame for the special issue’s six articles on the topic. Departing from the broader debate’s early history in the 1960s, this article contextualizes the emic–etic debate and locates its point of entry i...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Method & theory in the study of religion
Auteurs: Mostowlansky, Till (Auteur) ; Rota, Andrea 1983- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2016
Dans: Method & theory in the study of religion
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Science des religions / Analyse émique / Analyse étique
RelBib Classification:AA Sciences des religions
Sujets non-standardisés:B emic–etic insider–outsider methodology epistemology Pike Harris McCutcheon
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Informations sur les droits:InC 1.0
Description
Résumé:This article introduces the emic–etic debate in the scientific study of religion\s and provides a frame for the special issue’s six articles on the topic. Departing from the broader debate’s early history in the 1960s, this article contextualizes the emic–etic debate and locates its point of entry into the scientific study of religion\s in the 1980s. This article argues that in the course of the debate the insider–outsider and emic–etic complexes have become entangled. In order to facilitate an understanding of the debate, this article maintains that the emic–etic debate in the scientific study of religion\s touches upon three central dimensions (existential–political, methodological, and epistemological). In order to move toward a clearer methodological and epistemological framework, this article furthermore proposes an iterative model that locates insider–outsider at the level of observers and emic–etic at the level of categories.
ISSN:1570-0682
Contient:In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341367