To Naturalize is to Differentiate

Many scholars have expressed fears that naturalism will homogenize religion, thereby reifying the concept and distorting the academy’s perception of local cultures. Yet this fear is misplaced. In fact, recent advances in cognitive science, most notably regarding the development of interactional theo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Method & theory in the study of religion
Main Author: Ruper, Stefani (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2018
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B McCutcheon, Russell T. 1961- / Kognitive Religionswissenschaft / Naturalism (Philosophy) / Interactionalism / Fitzgerald, Timothy 1947-
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AE Psychology of religion
KBQ North America
Further subjects:B cognitive science of religion cognitive science naturalism theory of religion comparative religions Russell McCutcheon
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Summary:Many scholars have expressed fears that naturalism will homogenize religion, thereby reifying the concept and distorting the academy’s perception of local cultures. Yet this fear is misplaced. In fact, recent advances in cognitive science, most notably regarding the development of interactional theories of cognition, lend significant support to conceptualizing religion heterogeneously. In this paper I first explore Russell McCutcheon’s rationale for fearing naturalism. I then obviate McCutcheon’s fears by demonstrating how the interactionalist perspective in cognitive science both promotes a heterogeneous understanding of human behavior as well as refutes sui generis religion. I conclude by recommending fusing insights from interactionalism with a ground-up, sociological approach to “religion” such as Timothy Fitzgerald’s, which results in research methodology that is appropriately sensitive to the natural differences of behavior that have been historically identified as religious.
ISSN:1570-0682
Contains:In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341423