Cognitive Science of Religion and Folk Theistic Belief

Cognitive scientists of religion promise to lay bare the cognitive mechanisms that generate religious beliefs in human beings. Defenders of the debunking argument believe that the cognitive mechanisms studied in this field pose a threat to folk theism. A number of influential responses to the debunk...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zygon
Subtitles:Cognitive science of religion: explaining religion away?
Main Author: Lim, Daniel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2016]
In: Zygon
Further subjects:B causal exclusion
B cognitive science of religion
B Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
B folk theism
B Debunking
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1555113273
003 DE-627
005 20180302162050.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170308s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/zygo.12304  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1555113273 
035 |a (DE-576)485113279 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ485113279 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042550247  |0 (DE-627)769104150  |0 (DE-576)394027167  |4 aut  |a Lim, Daniel 
109 |a Lim, Daniel 
245 1 0 |a Cognitive Science of Religion and Folk Theistic Belief  |c Daniel Lim 
246 1 |i Rubrikentitel  |a Cognitive science of religion: explaining religion away? 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Cognitive scientists of religion promise to lay bare the cognitive mechanisms that generate religious beliefs in human beings. Defenders of the debunking argument believe that the cognitive mechanisms studied in this field pose a threat to folk theism. A number of influential responses to the debunking argument rely on making two sets of distinctions: (1) proximate/ultimate explanations and (2) specific/general religious beliefs. I argue, however, that such responses have drawbacks and do not make room for folk theism. I suggest that a detour through the literature in the philosophy of mind regarding the problem of mental causation regarding nonreductive physicalism can provide a way for preserving folk theism without doing violence to the way cognitive science of religion is being practiced today. More specifically, I believe there is a way of responding to the debunking argument that does not require a rejection of the causal premise. 
601 |a Religion 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)1153645505  |0 (DE-627)1015151884  |0 (DE-576)500375216  |a Kognitive Religionswissenschaft  |2 gnd 
650 4 |a causal exclusion 
650 4 |a cognitive science of religion 
650 4 |a Debunking 
650 4 |a folk theism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 51(2016), 4, Seite 949-965  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2016  |g number:4  |g pages:949-965 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12304  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 51  |j 2016  |e 4  |h 949-965 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 295827103X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1555113273 
LOK |0 005 20170308152042 
LOK |0 008 170308||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Cognitive science of religion