Faith, Belief, and the Compatibility of Religion and Science

Recent attacks on the compatibility of science and religion by the “militant modern atheists” (Jerry Coyne, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens) have posed serious challenges for anyone who supports the human importance of religious faith (particularly their identificat...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zygon
Subtitles:Reflective pieces
Main Author: Recker, Doren (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2017]
In: Zygon
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Religion / Natural sciences / Faith
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
CF Christianity and Science
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Belief
B Spirituality
B Dialogue
B transformative experience
B evolution vs. creationism
B compatibility of science and religion
B experiential religion
B Faith
B militant modern atheists
B God hypothesis
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Recent attacks on the compatibility of science and religion by the “militant modern atheists” (Jerry Coyne, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens) have posed serious challenges for anyone who supports the human importance of religious faith (particularly their identification of “faith” with “believing without evidence”). This article offers a critical analysis of their claims compared with those who do not equate faith with belief. I conclude that (i) the militant modern atheist interpretation of faith undervalues transformative religious experiences, (ii) that more people of faith hold it for this reason than their opponents acknowledge, and (iii) that meaningful dialogue between religion and science is both possible and desirable.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contains:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12326