The aesthetic turn
This paper considers alternative styles of philosophy, based on art or science, through an investigation of Rudolf Carnap and Martin Heidegger. Carnap’s criticism of Heidegger’s account of das Nichts is analysed in relation to Immanuel Kant’s theory of the imagination. Heidegger’s account of the wor...
| Publié dans: | Approaching religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[publisher not identified]
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
Approaching religion
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Heidegger, Martin 1889-1976
/ Carnap, Rudolf 1891-1970
/ Néant
/ Esthétique
/ Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Heidegger
B Loos B Architecture B Imagination B Tillich B Religion B Perception B Style B Philosophy B Kant |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | This paper considers alternative styles of philosophy, based on art or science, through an investigation of Rudolf Carnap and Martin Heidegger. Carnap’s criticism of Heidegger’s account of das Nichts is analysed in relation to Immanuel Kant’s theory of the imagination. Heidegger’s account of the work of art demonstrates philosophies that take science as their model, over-emphasize cognition, and do not adequately consider the importance of apprehension. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1799-3121 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Approaching religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30664/ar.67586 |