The problem of polytheisms: a serious challenge to theism

Theistic and analytic philosophers of religion typically privilege classical theism and monotheism by ignoring or underestimating the great threat of polytheism (We take 'theism' to mean 'classical theism', which is but one of many possible monotheisms. Avoiding much of the discu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal for philosophy of religion
Authors: Lataster, Raphael (Author) ; Philipse, Herman 1951- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2017]
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Monotheism / Theism / Polytheism
Further subjects:B Philosophers
B Theism
B Polytheism
B Argument from infinitely many alternatives
B Monotheism
B Transcendence (Philosophy)
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Theistic and analytic philosophers of religion typically privilege classical theism and monotheism by ignoring or underestimating the great threat of polytheism (We take 'theism' to mean 'classical theism', which is but one of many possible monotheisms. Avoiding much of the discussion around classical theism, we wish to focus on the challenges in arguing for monotheism over polytheism. We take monotheisms and polytheisms to be versions of supernaturalism, and not of 'theism'. We consider monotheisms and polytheisms to entail the notion of divine transcendence). We develop an argument from infinitely many alternatives, which decisively demonstrates that if a monotheistic or polytheistic god-model obtains, it will almost certainly be polytheistic. Probabilistic calculations are performed in order to illustrate the difficulties faced by the monotheistic proponent. After considering possible objections, such as whether there should be limits placed on how many possible god-models could obtain, we conclude that our argument from infinitely many alternatives is sound, and highly unlikely to be overcome.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-015-9554-x