Perfection Perfected: The Stoic "Self-Eluding Sage" and Moral Progress in Hebrews

Hebrews evinces the linked exegetical aporiae of, on the one hand, tension between the asserted perfection of the believer and exhortations to further perfection and, on the other, a similar tension between Christ’s exalted, preexistent nature and claims about his need for further perfection during...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Novum Testamentum
Auteur principal: Luckritz Marquis, Timothy (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2015
Dans: Novum Testamentum
Année: 2015, Volume: 57, Numéro: 2, Pages: 187-205
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Bibel. Hebräerbrief / Éthique chrétienne / Progrès / Stoa / Sage
RelBib Classification:HC Nouveau Testament
NCA Éthique
TB Antiquité
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Hebrews Stoicism moral progress soteriology Christology
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Édition parallèle:Non-électronique
Description
Résumé:Hebrews evinces the linked exegetical aporiae of, on the one hand, tension between the asserted perfection of the believer and exhortations to further perfection and, on the other, a similar tension between Christ’s exalted, preexistent nature and claims about his need for further perfection during his earthly life. The paper proposes the Stoic figure of the “self-eluding sage” as a helpful contextual analogue for explaining the indicative-imperative problem in Hebrews. Originally a product of early epistemological debates among Hellenistic philosophical schools, the “self-eluding sage” (διαλεληθὼς σοφός) was deployed by Philo and Plutarch in Roman-era debates on the nature of moral progress. Terminological and structural similarities between discussions of the Stoic figure and discussions of progress in Hebrews (especially 5:14-6:3) help contextualize the speech’s concern for moral insight and improvement within a general Roman-era focus on moral progress toward filling communal roles.
ISSN:1568-5365
Contient:In: Novum Testamentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685365-12341493