A Response to the Review of Matthew Barrett

This short methodological rebuttal points out that church history is not an attempt to prove Arminius or any other historical person to be right or wrong, but a scientific effort to represent them without negative bias or prejudice.

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Church history and religious culture
Main Author: Gunter, W. Stephen (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2014
In: Church history and religious culture
Further subjects:B Arminius historical theology methodology
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Summary:This short methodological rebuttal points out that church history is not an attempt to prove Arminius or any other historical person to be right or wrong, but a scientific effort to represent them without negative bias or prejudice.
ISSN:1871-2428
Contains:In: Church history and religious culture
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18712428-09401002