A Response to the Review of Matthew Barrett
This short methodological rebuttal points out that church history is not an attempt to prove Arminius or any other historical person to be right or wrong, but a scientific effort to represent them without negative bias or prejudice.
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2014
|
| In: |
Church history and religious culture
Jahr: 2014, Band: 94, Heft: 1, Seiten: 73-76 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Arminius
historical theology
methodology
|
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This short methodological rebuttal points out that church history is not an attempt to prove Arminius or any other historical person to be right or wrong, but a scientific effort to represent them without negative bias or prejudice. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-2428 |
| Enthält: | In: Church history and religious culture
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18712428-09401002 |