On the Standards-Variantist Solution to Skepticism
The skeptical puzzle consists of three independently plausible yet jointly inconsistent claims: (A) S knows a certain ordinary proposition op; (B) S does not know the denial of a certain skeptical hypothesis sh; and (C) S knows that op only if S knows that not-sh. The variantist solution (to the ske...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2017
|
In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2017, Volume: 7, Issue: 3, Pages: 173-198 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Scepticism
/ Epistemic modal logic
|
Further subjects: | B
epistemic contextualism
standards variantism
position variantism
skepticism
pragmatic penetration
intellectualism
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1563007789 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240316100225.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170904s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-00001224 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1563007789 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)493007784 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ493007784 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1159602387 |0 (DE-627)102228813X |0 (DE-576)505072424 |4 aut |a Lee, Kok Yong | |
109 | |a Lee, Kok Yong |a Kok Yong Lee |a Li, Guoyang | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the Standards-Variantist Solution to Skepticism |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The skeptical puzzle consists of three independently plausible yet jointly inconsistent claims: (A) S knows a certain ordinary proposition op; (B) S does not know the denial of a certain skeptical hypothesis sh; and (C) S knows that op only if S knows that not-sh. The variantist solution (to the skeptical puzzle) claims that (A) and not-(B) are true in the ordinary context, but false in the skeptical one. Epistemic contextualism has offered a standards-variantist solution, which is the most prominent variantist solution on the market. In this paper, I argue that the standards-variantist solution in general (and the contextualist solution in particular) is epistemically uninteresting. Proponents of the variantist solution should opt for the position-variantist solution instead. I will discuss some important implications of my findings. | ||
650 | 4 | |a epistemic contextualism |x standards variantism |x position variantism |x skepticism |x pragmatic penetration |x intellectualism | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4055225-1 |0 (DE-627)104213140 |0 (DE-576)209112794 |2 gnd |a Skeptizismus |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4152538-3 |0 (DE-627)10553756X |0 (DE-576)209796324 |2 gnd |a Epistemische Logik |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 7(2017), 3, Seite 173-198 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:173-198 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-00001224 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2979297852 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1563007789 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20170904034006 | ||
LOK | |0 008 170904||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Epistemic modal logic,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Logique épistémique,Scepticisme |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Escepticismo,Lógica epistémica |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Logica epistemica,Scetticismo |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 怀疑主义,怀疑论 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 懷疑主義,懷疑論,认识逻辑 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ceticismo,Lógica epistêmica |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Скептицизм,Эпистемическая логика |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Επιστημονική λογική,Σκεπτικισμός |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Skepsis,Skeptik |