On the Standards-Variantist Solution to Skepticism
The skeptical puzzle consists of three independently plausible yet jointly inconsistent claims: (A) S knows a certain ordinary proposition op; (B) S does not know the denial of a certain skeptical hypothesis sh; and (C) S knows that op only if S knows that not-sh. The variantist solution (to the ske...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2017, Volume: 7, Issue: 3, Pages: 173-198 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Scepticism
/ Epistemic modal logic
|
| Further subjects: | B
epistemic contextualism
standards variantism
position variantism
skepticism
pragmatic penetration
intellectualism
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1563007789 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240316100225.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170904s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-00001224 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1563007789 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)493007784 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ493007784 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1159602387 |0 (DE-627)102228813X |0 (DE-576)505072424 |4 aut |a Lee, Kok Yong | |
| 109 | |a Lee, Kok Yong |a Kok Yong Lee |a Li, Guoyang | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the Standards-Variantist Solution to Skepticism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The skeptical puzzle consists of three independently plausible yet jointly inconsistent claims: (A) S knows a certain ordinary proposition op; (B) S does not know the denial of a certain skeptical hypothesis sh; and (C) S knows that op only if S knows that not-sh. The variantist solution (to the skeptical puzzle) claims that (A) and not-(B) are true in the ordinary context, but false in the skeptical one. Epistemic contextualism has offered a standards-variantist solution, which is the most prominent variantist solution on the market. In this paper, I argue that the standards-variantist solution in general (and the contextualist solution in particular) is epistemically uninteresting. Proponents of the variantist solution should opt for the position-variantist solution instead. I will discuss some important implications of my findings. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a epistemic contextualism |x standards variantism |x position variantism |x skepticism |x pragmatic penetration |x intellectualism | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4055225-1 |0 (DE-627)104213140 |0 (DE-576)209112794 |2 gnd |a Skeptizismus |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4152538-3 |0 (DE-627)10553756X |0 (DE-576)209796324 |2 gnd |a Epistemische Logik |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 7(2017), 3, Seite 173-198 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:173-198 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-00001224 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2979297852 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1563007789 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170904034006 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170904||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Epistemic modal logic,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Logique épistémique,Scepticisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Escepticismo,Lógica epistémica |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Logica epistemica,Scetticismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 怀疑主义,怀疑论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 懷疑主義,懷疑論,认识逻辑 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ceticismo,Lógica epistêmica |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Скептицизм,Эпистемическая логика |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Επιστημονική λογική,Σκεπτικισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Skepsis,Skeptik |