A Critical Analysis and Response to Hume from a Pneumatological Perspective

In the course of the history of Christianity, one of the most advocated and denigrated concepts is the miraculous. The situation in which Scottish philosopher David Hume lived was ripe for the refutation of the miraculous. After a lengthy critical analysis of Hume, this paper argues that he did not...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: McCall, Bradford ca. 21. Jh. (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2017
In: Journal of pentecostal theology
Jahr: 2017, Band: 26, Heft: 2, Seiten: 233-251
RelBib Classification:CF Christentum und Wissenschaft
KAH Kirchengeschichte 1648-1913; Neuzeit
NBG Pneumatologie; Heiliger Geist
VA Philosophie
weitere Schlagwörter:B Pneumatology David Hume miracles Renewal theology panentheism
Online-Zugang: Volltext (Verlag)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the course of the history of Christianity, one of the most advocated and denigrated concepts is the miraculous. The situation in which Scottish philosopher David Hume lived was ripe for the refutation of the miraculous. After a lengthy critical analysis of Hume, this paper argues that he did not successfully negate either the possibility of the miraculous or the plausibility of the miraculous. Instead, this paper asserts that the modern Renewal movement – with its renewed emphasis on pneumatology – has given new weight to the affirmation of miracles. In keeping with classical theists, the Renewal movement also grounds both the possibility and plausibility of the miraculous on the nature of God. The panentheistically informed pneumatological understanding of the God/world relationship herein advocated posits that the Spirit acts in a personal, direct, and specific manner.
Physische Details:Online-Ressource
ISSN:1745-5251
Enthält:In: Journal of pentecostal theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/17455251-02602005