A Jewish Response to Gavin D'Costa, "Vatican II: Catholic Doctrines on Jews and Christians"

Responding from a Jewish perspective to Gavin D’Costa’s theology of Jews and Judaism as expressed in his book on Vatican II, I examine the implications of his rejection of some of the most important fruits of Catholic-Jewish dialogue in the past half-century. His theology leaves little space for the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Langer, Ruth 1960- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [publisher not identified] [2017]
In: Louvain studies
Year: 2017, Volume: 40, Issue: 3, Pages: 273-285
Review of:Vatican II (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2014) (Langer, Ruth)
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Vatican Council 2. (1962-1965 : Vatikanstadt), Nostra aetate / Catholic church / Judaism / Interfaith dialogue / Mission
RelBib Classification:BH Judaism
CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KDB Roman Catholic Church
RJ Mission; missiology
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Responding from a Jewish perspective to Gavin D’Costa’s theology of Jews and Judaism as expressed in his book on Vatican II, I examine the implications of his rejection of some of the most important fruits of Catholic-Jewish dialogue in the past half-century. His theology leaves little space for the living Judaism of today and Jewish self-understanding, matters considered crucial in the Vatican’s implementation documents for Nostra Aetate 4. Consequently, he misunderstands the Jewish perception that all Christian mission, even if non-coercive, constitutes a grave existential threat. Finally, I address D’Costa’s reliance on the concept of ‘invincible ignorance’ and the unfortunate impact of employing technical terminology whose nuances one’s listeners will misunderstand. I suggest alternative framings of all these topics that would be more compatible with Jewish self-understanding.
ISSN:0024-6964
Reference:Kritik in "A Response to the Essays (2017)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Louvain studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/LS.40.3.3245492