“They Just Don’t Stand for Nothing”: LGBT Christians’ Definitions of Non-Religious Others
In this exploratory study, I examine how a group of LGBT Christians conceptualized non-religious others. Based on over 450 hours of fieldwork in an LGBT Christian church located in the southeastern region of the United States, I demonstrate how a group of LGBT Christians defined non-religious others...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[publisher not identified]
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
Secularism and Nonreligion
Année: 2016, Volume: 5, Pages: 1-12 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
USA
/ LGBT
/ Chrétien
/ Irréligion
/ Fremdgruppe
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion AG Vie religieuse |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
LGBT Christians
B Inequalities B Non-Religious People |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | In this exploratory study, I examine how a group of LGBT Christians conceptualized non-religious others. Based on over 450 hours of fieldwork in an LGBT Christian church located in the southeastern region of the United States, I demonstrate how a group of LGBT Christians defined non-religious others as (1) morally suspect and untrustworthy, (2) in need of salvation and guidance, and (3) poor representations of the LGBT community. Although these LGBT Christians used “non-religious” as a catchall term without ever specifying exactly who it captured, they used the first two definitions to apply to non-religious people in general regardless of sexuality while explicitly focusing on non-religious sexual minorities in their third definition. Moreover, I show how these definitions echoed mainstream religious rhetoric in America used to marginalize both sexual and religious minorities. In conclusion, I draw out two central implications of this work: (1) how religious depictions of non-religious people may reproduce societal patterns of inequality; and (2) the importance of analyzing how religious people define and interpret non-religious others. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2053-6712 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Secularism and Nonreligion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5334/snr.19 |