The Logical Problem of the Trinity and the Strong Theory of Relative Identity
In this paper, I consider the philosophical consequences of one tradition in Trinitarian theology, which emphasizes that each of the persons of the Trinity is wholly God. I pay special attention to Leftows claim that the persons of the Godhead must be divine in the same sense of the word divine a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Netherlands
[2017]
|
In: |
Sophia
Year: 2017, Volume: 56, Issue: 2, Pages: 227-245 |
RelBib Classification: | FA Theology NBC Doctrine of God VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Trinity
B Philosophical Theology B Identity B Logic |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1565892720 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20171130121423.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 171130s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11841-017-0612-y |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1565892720 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)495892726 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ495892726 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Molto, Daniel |4 aut | |
109 | |a Molto, Daniel | ||
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Logical Problem of the Trinity and the Strong Theory of Relative Identity |c Daniel Molto |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this paper, I consider the philosophical consequences of one tradition in Trinitarian theology, which emphasizes that each of the persons of the Trinity is wholly God. I pay special attention to Leftows claim that the persons of the Godhead must be divine in the same sense of the word divine as the Godhead itself. I argue that the existing philosophical account of the Trinity which best captures this view is what I have termed the Strong Theory of Relative Identity, first proposed Peter Geach. I then develop what I take to be the most pressing objection to this account of the Trinity, namely that it cannot be supplemented with a coherent model-theoretic semantics. I end with a suggestion for responding to this objection. | ||
601 | |a Problem | ||
650 | 4 | |a Identity | |
650 | 4 | |a Logic | |
650 | 4 | |a Philosophical Theology | |
650 | 4 | |a Trinity | |
652 | |a FA:NBC:VB | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sophia |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962 |g 56(2017), 2, Seite 227-245 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543988392 |w (DE-600)2386792-9 |w (DE-576)271774215 |x 1873-930X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:56 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:227-245 |
856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11841-017-0612-y.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11841-017-0612-y |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-017-0612-y |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2988501149 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1565892720 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200629214802 | ||
LOK | |0 008 171130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205381X |a VB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044020 |a FA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |