Rejoinder
Martin provides a rejoinder to the responses by Stephen Bush, Kevin Schilbrack, and Jason Blum, focusing on the theoretical difficulties following from the legacy of phenomenology of religion.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 29, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 347-351 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bush, Stephen S. 1974-, Visions of religion
/ Philosophia perennis
/ Phenomenology of religion
/ Religious experience
/ Faith
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AG Religious life; material religion |
| Further subjects: | B
Perennialism
neo-perennialism
religious experience
belief
phenomenology of religion
epiphenomenalism
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | Martin provides a rejoinder to the responses by Stephen Bush, Kevin Schilbrack, and Jason Blum, focusing on the theoretical difficulties following from the legacy of phenomenology of religion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Reference: | Kommentar zu "The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin (2017)"
Kommentar zu "Religion and Belief After the Turn to Power: A Response to Craig Martin (2017)" Kommentar zu "Comparison and the Spectre of Perennialism: A Reply to Craig Martin (2017)" |
| Contains: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341395 |