Rejoinder

Martin provides a rejoinder to the responses by Stephen Bush, Kevin Schilbrack, and Jason Blum, focusing on the theoretical difficulties following from the legacy of phenomenology of religion.

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Martin, Craig 1976- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Invalid server response. (JOP server down?)
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2017
Dans: Method & theory in the study of religion
Année: 2017, Volume: 29, Numéro: 4/5, Pages: 347-351
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Bush, Stephen S. 1974-, Visions of religion / Philosophia perennis / Phénoménologie des religions / Expérience religieuse / Foi
RelBib Classification:AA Sciences des religions
AB Philosophie de la religion
AG Vie religieuse
Sujets non-standardisés:B Perennialism neo-perennialism religious experience belief phenomenology of religion epiphenomenalism
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:Martin provides a rejoinder to the responses by Stephen Bush, Kevin Schilbrack, and Jason Blum, focusing on the theoretical difficulties following from the legacy of phenomenology of religion.
Description matérielle:Online-Ressource
ISSN:1570-0682
Référence:Kommentar zu "The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin (2017)"
Kommentar zu "Religion and Belief After the Turn to Power: A Response to Craig Martin (2017)"
Kommentar zu "Comparison and the Spectre of Perennialism: A Reply to Craig Martin (2017)"
Contient:In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341395