Genesis as a Hidden Source of Manichaeism


There exists an entrenched notion, supported by both Christian and Manichaean texts, that Manicheans rejected the Old Testament as a product of Satan. However, scholars have noted the presence of loans from the Old Testament in Manichaean works. The Manichaean priest, Felix, in his dispute with St A...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scrinium
Main Author: Moiseeva, Evgenïa 1984-
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Published: Brill 2017
In: Scrinium
Year: 2017, Volume: 13, Issue: 1, Pages: 199-212
IxTheo Classification:BF Gnosticism
HB Old Testament
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
Further subjects:B Mani
 Manichaeism
 Genesis
 Old Testament
 Adda

Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Summary:There exists an entrenched notion, supported by both Christian and Manichaean texts, that Manicheans rejected the Old Testament as a product of Satan. However, scholars have noted the presence of loans from the Old Testament in Manichaean works. The Manichaean priest, Felix, in his dispute with St Augustine, documented in Augustine’s Contra Felicem Manicheum, cites Genesis 1:1-2 to demonstrate its agreement with Mani’s teachings. This and other examples show that the Manichaean attitude towards the Old Testament was more complicated than that of simple rejection. In this report, I review textual evidence from multiple Manichaean sources indicating that Jewish texts in general, and Genesis in particular, should be counted among the sources of Manichaeism. Furthermore, I address the question how this evidence could be reconciled with the long-standing view of the Manichaean rejection of the Old Testament.

ISSN:1817-7565
Contains:In: Scrinium
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18177565-00131p16