Responding to the Religious Reasons of Others: Resonance and Non-Reducitve Religious Pluralism
Call a belief non-negotiable if one cannot abandon the belief without the abandonment of ones religious (or non-religious) perspective. Although non-negotiable beliefs can logically exclude other perspectives, a non-reductive approach to religious pluralism can help to create a space within which...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2013]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 23-46 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
Summary: | Call a belief non-negotiable if one cannot abandon the belief without the abandonment of ones religious (or non-religious) perspective. Although non-negotiable beliefs can logically exclude other perspectives, a non-reductive approach to religious pluralism can help to create a space within which the non- negotiable beliefs of others that contradict ones own non-negotiable beliefs can be appreciated and understood as playing a justificatory role for the other. The appreciation of these beliefs through cognitive resonance plays a crucial role to enable the understanding of those who hold other perspectives. epistemological and spiritual consequences of this claim are explored. |
---|---|
Contains: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v5i2.232 |