Awe and Humility in the Face of Things: Somatic Practice in East-Asian Philosophies
Whereas the Platonic-Christian philosophical tradition in the West favours an ascent to theory and abstract reasoning, east-Asian philosophies tend to be rooted in somatic, or bodily, practice. In the philosophies of Confucius and Zhuangzi in China, and Kukai and Dogen in Japan, we can distinguish...
| Published in: | European journal for philosophy of religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2012]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Whereas the Platonic-Christian philosophical tradition in the West favours an ascent to theory and abstract reasoning, east-Asian philosophies tend to be rooted in somatic, or bodily, practice. In the philosophies of Confucius and Zhuangzi in China, and Kukai and Dogen in Japan, we can distinguish two different forms of somatic practice: developing physical skills, and what one might call realising relationships. These practices improve our relations with others - whether the ancestors or our contemporaries, the things with which we surround ourselves or the phenomena of nature - by reducing egocentrism and increasing humility. Because they transform the practitioners experience, the major benefit of philosophies grounded in somatic practice is that they help close the gap between beliefs and behaviour, and between ideas and action. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v4i3.277 |