The Problem of God's Existence
There are four main positions in the argument about whether God exists: atheism (God does not exist), theism (God exists), agnosticism (it is impossible to know whether God exists or not), and scepticism (at the moment we do not know whether God exists or not). From an epistemological standpoint, sc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2015]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 143-163 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Existence of God
/ Theism
/ Atheism
/ Agnosticism
/ Scepticism
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1567183174 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180731125042.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180115s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v7i1.135 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1567183174 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)49718317X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ49718317X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ziemiński, Ireneusz |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Problem of God's Existence |c Ireneusz Zieminski |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a There are four main positions in the argument about whether God exists: atheism (God does not exist), theism (God exists), agnosticism (it is impossible to know whether God exists or not), and scepticism (at the moment we do not know whether God exists or not). From an epistemological standpoint, scepticism is the most rational; even if a decisive argument which would settle the debate has not been discovered yet, one cannot exclude the possibility of finding it eventually. Agnosticism is too radical (and even incoherent), but theism and atheism exceed the available data. However, from a practical standpoint, choosing theism or atheism seems to be more rational than scepticism (not to mention agnosticism); one of them is bound to be right, because there are only two possibilities, one of which has to be true: either God exists or not. | ||
601 | |a Problem | ||
652 | |a AB | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4131943-6 |0 (DE-627)10415165X |0 (DE-576)209631457 |2 gnd |a Gottesfrage |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4003364-8 |0 (DE-627)106389815 |0 (DE-576)208851305 |2 gnd |a Atheismus |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4141626-0 |0 (DE-627)105618934 |0 (DE-576)209712848 |2 gnd |a Agnostizismus |
689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4055225-1 |0 (DE-627)104213140 |0 (DE-576)209112794 |2 gnd |a Skeptizismus |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 7(2015), 1, Seite 143-163 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:143-163 |
856 | |u http://ojs3.uibk.ac.at/ojs/index.php/EJPR/article/download/135/94 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/135 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v7i1.135 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2992876852 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1567183174 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180518145644 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Agnosticism,Atheism,Atheism,Existence of God,God,God question,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism,Theism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Agnosticisme,Athéisme,Athéisme,Question de l’existence de Dieu,Scepticisme,Théisme |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Agnosticismo,Ateísmo,Ateísmo,Cuestión de la existencia de Dios,Escepticismo,Teísmo |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Agnosticismo,Ateismo,Ateismo,Questione dell'esistenza di Dio,Scetticismo,Teismo |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 不可知论,不可知主义,怀疑主义,怀疑论,无神论,有神论,神存在的提问,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提问 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 不可知論,不可知主義,懷疑主義,懷疑論,有神論,無神論,神存在的提問,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提問 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Agnosticismo,Ateísmo,Ateísmo,Ceticismo,Questão da existência de Deus,Teísmo |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Агностицизм,Атеизм (мотив),Атеизм,Вопрос о существовании Бога,Скептицизм,Теизм |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αγνωστικισμός,Αθεϊσμός (μοτίβο),Αθεϊσμός,Ερώτημα της ύπαρξης του Θεού,Θεϊσμός,Σκεπτικισμός |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Existenz Gottes , Gottlosigkeit , Skepsis,Skeptik |