Another look at Hume's treatment of the argument from design in the Natural History of Religion
This article argues that Hume's seemingly peculiar treatment of the argument from design in his Natural History of Religion is not indicative of a radical, or even modest, shift in his overall epistemic evaluation of it. His focus is on the argument's impact on the psychology of religious...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2016]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Jahr: 2016, Band: 52, Heft: 4, Seiten: 461-474 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Hume, David 1711-1776, Four dissertations
/ Natürliche Religion
/ Teleologie
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus VA Philosophie |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article argues that Hume's seemingly peculiar treatment of the argument from design in his Natural History of Religion is not indicative of a radical, or even modest, shift in his overall epistemic evaluation of it. His focus is on the argument's impact on the psychology of religious believers, and not its rational acceptability. Hume never strays far from his stated intention for the work, to engage in a socio-psychological analysis of the nature of religious belief, including a thorough assessment of the role of the argument from design. Hume concludes that the argument is inconsequential to religious belief formation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412516000068 |