The Crucial Importance of Nancey Murphy's Deployment of Lakatos's Methodology for Theology and Science

Russell's paper explores the astonishing fruitfulness of Nancey Murphy's use of Imre Lakatos's philosophy of science in the field of "theology and science." Murphy's work can be used to choose between competing theologies according to the theologians' willingness t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theology and science
Main Author: Russell, Robert J. 1946- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge [2017]
In: Theology and science
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
CF Christianity and Science
NBD Doctrine of Creation
NBF Christology
Further subjects:B quantum mechanics
B creation and cosmology
B philosophy of science
B Imre Lakatos
B creative mutual interaction
B Evolutionary Biology
B non-interventionist objective divine action
B Cosmic Christ
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Russell's paper explores the astonishing fruitfulness of Nancey Murphy's use of Imre Lakatos's philosophy of science in the field of "theology and science." Murphy's work can be used to choose between competing theologies according to the theologians' willingness to engage with science, their ability to continue the engagement as scientific theories change, and their ability to make empirical predictions based on this engagement. Topics range from creation and cosmology, the "cosmic Christ", and non-interventionist objective divine action in quantum mechanics and evolution. Russell has followed Murphy's lead and used Lakatos to place theology and science into "creative mutual interaction" (CMI).
ISSN:1474-6700
Reference:Kritik in "Response to Early, Russell, Brown, and Newson (2017)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Theology and science
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2017.1369754