Religious Representation and Animal Welfare in the U.S. Senate
Does religion affect legislative behavior among U.S. senators? Scholars have established this relationship on issues closely associated with evangelical Christianity, but it is unclear how far the relationship extends. Focusing on animal welfare, this article tests the theory of personal representat...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
In: |
Journal for the scientific study of religion
Jahr: 2017, Band: 56, Heft: 1, Seiten: 162-178 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
USA, Congress, Senate
/ Senator
/ Religion
/ Tierrecht
/ Tierethik
|
RelBib Classification: | KBQ Nordamerika NCG Ökologische Ethik; Schöpfungsethik |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
U.S. Senate
B Animal welfare B Representation |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Zusammenfassung: | Does religion affect legislative behavior among U.S. senators? Scholars have established this relationship on issues closely associated with evangelical Christianity, but it is unclear how far the relationship extends. Focusing on animal welfare, this article tests the theory of personal representation and provides an expansion of the religion and legislative behavior literature. Humane Society scores (2005-2014) are regressed on senator religion, party, sex, and several constituency factors. The analysis demonstrates that religion shapes animal welfare activity. Relative to mainline Protestant senators, Mormon senators are less supportive of animal welfare, while Catholics, Jews, and black Protestants are more supportive. Some of this is due to senator religion, but it is also a reflection of state-level factors, including state ideology and religious constituencies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1468-5906 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12317 |