The Growth of Alternative Therapy: A Valid Argument against the Secularisation Thesis?
The fact that alternative therapy has experienced vast growth during the last 30 years in most of the West is used by both Paul Heelas and Linda Woodhead as an argument against the secularisation theory. The objective of this article is to examine whether such an argument can be seen as being valid....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Carfax Publ.
[2015]
|
In: |
Journal of contemporary religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 30, Issue: 3, Pages: 399-413 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Western world
/ Alternative medicine
/ Secularism
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | The fact that alternative therapy has experienced vast growth during the last 30 years in most of the West is used by both Paul Heelas and Linda Woodhead as an argument against the secularisation theory. The objective of this article is to examine whether such an argument can be seen as being valid. In order to do this, four preconditions are formulated whose fulfilment I consider to be necessary if the above-mentioned arguments against the secularisation theory are to be accepted. The four preconditions are discussed; they are as follows: 1) alternative therapy is of significant magnitude; 2) the alternative therapists themselves consider the practice to be spiritual; 3) the clients seeing such spiritual' therapists have a spiritually informed motive to do so; 4) spirituality' as understood both by practitioners and by clients has religious' connotations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-9419 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of contemporary religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2015.1081342 |