Reinventing Buddhist Practices to Meet the Challenge of Climate Change
A number of thinkers have argued that ethicists have gone about responding to climate change in the wrong way, i.e., by "greening" their religious worldviews and hoping for conversion. Instead, we should be examining existing moral reform projects that can be learning experiences. In respo...
| Published in: | Contemporary buddhism |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
[2016]
|
| In: |
Contemporary buddhism
Year: 2016, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Pages: 138-156 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | A number of thinkers have argued that ethicists have gone about responding to climate change in the wrong way, i.e., by "greening" their religious worldviews and hoping for conversion. Instead, we should be examining existing moral reform projects that can be learning experiences. In response, this article looks at three forms of Buddhist practice from below: "tree ordination" by Thai "ecology monks," Joanna Macy's "work that reconnects," and Gary Snyder's practice of reinhabitation. Each of these practices is both promising and inadequate in meeting the moral challenge of climate change. For each of these ecological practices I will: (1) describe the practice in its social context; (2) indicate its Buddhist roots; (3) present what I see as the efficacy of the practice and its inadequacies; and (4) offer one way in which this practice might evolve towards greater efficacy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-7953 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Contemporary buddhism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14639947.2016.1162976 |