Response to Walter Moberly's "Theological Thinking and the Reading of Scripture"

This article is a response to Walter Moberly's critical appraisal of my interpretation of Rom 9-11.¹ It seeks, on the one hand, to locate more specifically the hermeneutical disagreement between Moberly and me, concluding that Moberly (unlike me) continues to privilege historically "origin...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of theological interpretation
Main Author: Ticciati, Susannah (Author)
Contributors: Moberly, Walter 1952- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: The Pennsylvania State University Press 2016
In: Journal of theological interpretation
RelBib Classification:HA Bible
NBD Doctrine of Creation
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B Theology
B Love
B Bible
B Redaction
B Interpretive communities
B Observational frames of reference
B Old Testament
B Torah
B Jewish History
B Vocation
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article is a response to Walter Moberly's critical appraisal of my interpretation of Rom 9-11.¹ It seeks, on the one hand, to locate more specifically the hermeneutical disagreement between Moberly and me, concluding that Moberly (unlike me) continues to privilege historically "original" meaning. It argues, on the other hand, for a relational hermeneutic that enables creation ex nihilo to function as a valid interpretational frame of reference (for both Rom 9-11 and Deut 32), thus addressing Moberly's charge of "anachronism."
ISSN:2576-7933
Reference:Kritik von "Theological Thinking and the Reading of Scripture (2016)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of theological interpretation
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/26373990