Response to Walter Moberly's "Theological Thinking and the Reading of Scripture"
This article is a response to Walter Moberly's critical appraisal of my interpretation of Rom 9-11.¹ It seeks, on the one hand, to locate more specifically the hermeneutical disagreement between Moberly and me, concluding that Moberly (unlike me) continues to privilege historically "origin...
| Publié dans: | Journal of theological interpretation |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
The Pennsylvania State University Press
2016
|
| Dans: |
Journal of theological interpretation
|
| RelBib Classification: | HA Bible NBD Création VB Herméneutique; philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theology
B Love B Bible B Redaction B Interpretive communities B Observational frames of reference B Old Testament B Torah B Jewish History B Vocation |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This article is a response to Walter Moberly's critical appraisal of my interpretation of Rom 9-11.¹ It seeks, on the one hand, to locate more specifically the hermeneutical disagreement between Moberly and me, concluding that Moberly (unlike me) continues to privilege historically "original" meaning. It argues, on the other hand, for a relational hermeneutic that enables creation ex nihilo to function as a valid interpretational frame of reference (for both Rom 9-11 and Deut 32), thus addressing Moberly's charge of "anachronism." |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2576-7933 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "Theological Thinking and the Reading of Scripture (2016)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of theological interpretation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/26373990 |