Impossible, Inadequate, and Indispensable: What North American Christian Social Ethics Can Learn from Postcolonial Theory

Postcolonial theory ought to inform how we do Christian social ethics in North America. This essay engages postcolonial critiques of the "impossibility" that intellectuals can address the needs of unrepresented groups (Spivak). It also examines postcolonial theorists' move to localize...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Azaransky, Sarah (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center [2017]
In: Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 37, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-63
RelBib Classification:FD Contextual theology
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KBQ North America
NCC Social ethics
NCD Political ethics
VA Philosophy
ZC Politics in general
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Postcolonial theory ought to inform how we do Christian social ethics in North America. This essay engages postcolonial critiques of the "impossibility" that intellectuals can address the needs of unrepresented groups (Spivak). It also examines postcolonial theorists' move to localize European thinking and, in so doing, to recognize European thinking as both "indispensable and inadequate" (Chakrabarty) to justice-oriented work. The essay engages contemporary post-colonial theory with the writing and work of Howard Thurman, William Stuart Nelson, and Bayard Rustin, midcentury black American Christian intellectuals, in order to show how postcolonial theory may be useful for contemporary Christian social ethics.
ISSN:2326-2176
Contains:Enthalten in: Society of Christian Ethics, Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/sce.2017.0004