A Malignant Israeli-Palestinian Conflict? A Cardiothoracic Surgeon's Perspective and Remedial Implications

A debate persists whether the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be resolved through substantive and ‘painful' compromises or that the foundational parametres of the conflict apriori deny a resolution. The nationalist Zionist agenda of mass Jewish settlement in Palestine inevitably clashed with P...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies
Main Author: Nathanson, Michael (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Edinburgh Univ. Press [2015]
In: Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies
Year: 2015, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 105-122
Further subjects:B Palestinian Nationalism
B Two-state solution
B Decisive timely intervention
B Confederative arrangement
B Balfour Declaration
B Israeli-Palestinian conflict
B Malignant disease process
B Intractability
B Rheumatic valvular disease
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:A debate persists whether the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be resolved through substantive and ‘painful' compromises or that the foundational parametres of the conflict apriori deny a resolution. The nationalist Zionist agenda of mass Jewish settlement in Palestine inevitably clashed with Palestinian nationalist sentiments. Both nationalist movements saw the conflict as mutually exclusive. European imperialist designs and US political considerations at home only cemented the intractability of the conflict. As such, the conflict is akin to a human malignant process that is allowed to progress unchecked and compromises its host because those who were and are responsible to eradicate it have committed malpractice.
ISSN:2054-1996
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.3366/hlps.2015.0106