Nitobe's and Uchimura's Schools of Thought and Post-War Democratic Education: A Fault in Personality Development Education
It is now recognised that the followers of Inazo Nitobe and Kanzo Uchimura played a highly important role in the development of post-war democratic education in Japan. In particular, Tamon Maeda is considered to have determined the direction of post-war education. This article briefly reviews the ac...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Liverpool University Press
[2017]
|
In: |
Quaker studies
Year: 2017, Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Pages: 85-98 |
RelBib Classification: | CF Christianity and Science KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KBM Asia KDG Free church |
Further subjects: | B
Education
B Japan B Shigeru Nanbara B Inazo Nitobe B Tamon Maeda B Kotaro Tanaka B Kanzo Uchimura |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | It is now recognised that the followers of Inazo Nitobe and Kanzo Uchimura played a highly important role in the development of post-war democratic education in Japan. In particular, Tamon Maeda is considered to have determined the direction of post-war education. This article briefly reviews the achievements of the followers of Nitobe and Uchimura and then focuses on Tamon Maeda and his philosophy on education. Like the other followers, Maeda firmly believed that the development of individuality and personality was necessary for the establishment of a democracy. Nevertheless, Maeda's belief lacks the factor of otherness' that helps to achieve self-establishment. As a result, there is only the possibility of realising a self-sufficient self in an intimate relationship with the highest being. On this point there is a definite contradiction within Maeda's idea of self-establishment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2397-1770 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Quaker studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3828/quaker.2017.22.1.5 |