Justifiable Killing in War? For Taking the Soldier's Stance Seriously in War Ethics

The paper builds on a current debate in the philosophy of war, which are rules that contribute to the containment of war and to a system of fair rules in warfare. Both are key issues in the “jus in bello” as a central part of war ethics. Recently, philosophers have questioned a general exculpation o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kallhoff, Angela 1968- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill [2018]
In: Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
Year: 2018, Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Pages: 6-20
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B War / Killing / Justification (Philosophy) / Religion
RelBib Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
CG Christianity and Politics
NCD Political ethics
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:The paper builds on a current debate in the philosophy of war, which are rules that contribute to the containment of war and to a system of fair rules in warfare. Both are key issues in the “jus in bello” as a central part of war ethics. Recently, philosophers have questioned a general exculpation of soldiers in that context. Instead of restricting the debate on “justifiable killing” to the “jus ad bellum,”which explores moral restrictions in starting warfare, philosophers examine moral implications when soldiers kill in war. Even though epistemic limitations and duties of soldiers need to be taken into account, the paper argues for a more detailed exploration of acts of killing in war by soldiers.
ISSN:2364-2807
Contains:Enthalten in: Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.14220/jrat.2018.4.1.6