On the Limits of Rights and Representation
This essay explores the degree to which public reason can sustain political liberalism's commitment to justice and pluralism without attending to the role of what Jeffrey Stout calls cultural inheritance in shaping and justifying political commitments. At issue is whether public reason is the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2015]
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 43, Issue: 4, Pages: 697-722 |
| Further subjects: | B
John Rawls
B marriage equality B Stanley Hauerwas B public reason B epistemic diversity B moral problem of blackness B cultural inheritance B W. E. B. Du Bois B affected ignorance |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1580182925 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180820103256.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180820s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12118 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1580182925 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)510182925 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ510182925 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1164986996 |0 (DE-627)1029201404 |0 (DE-576)510183530 |4 aut |a Johnson, Terrence L. | |
| 109 | |a Johnson, Terrence L. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the Limits of Rights and Representation |c Terrence L. Johnson |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This essay explores the degree to which public reason can sustain political liberalism's commitment to justice and pluralism without attending to the role of what Jeffrey Stout calls cultural inheritance in shaping and justifying political commitments. At issue is whether public reason is the best resource for guiding conversations on political matters that are enmeshed in religious commitments and moral beliefs. Unless public reason can account for cultural inheritance, and foster a deliberative context in which political actors might grapple with the relationship between overlapping political claims and comprehensive doctrines, public reason will remain narrow and inadequate in a contemporary world where epistemic diversity is increasingly at odds with political liberalism's normative model of social cooperation and public deliberation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a John Rawls | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stanley Hauerwas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a W. E. B. Du Bois | |
| 650 | 4 | |a affected ignorance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cultural inheritance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a epistemic diversity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a marriage equality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moral problem of blackness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a public reason | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 43(2015), 4, Seite 697-722 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:43 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:697-722 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12118 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12118 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 43 |j 2015 |e 4 |h 697-722 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3022597657 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1580182925 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180820101055 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||