Measuring Actual Payment for Biodiversity Protection
I report the results of an experiment using a convenience sample of subjects recruited on Amazon Mechanical Turk that examines how religiously and scientifically framed messages about biodiversity loss influence a choice to make donations to protect against biodiversity loss. Subjects who received a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2018
|
In: |
Worldviews
Year: 2018, Volume: 22, Issue: 3, Pages: 263-288 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Experiment
/ Environmental protection
/ Donations
/ Patient compliance (Psychology)
/ Christianity
/ Influence
|
RelBib Classification: | AE Psychology of religion CF Christianity and Science NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics |
Further subjects: | B
biodiversity protection
willingness to pay
greening of religion
zero-inflated Poisson regression
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | I report the results of an experiment using a convenience sample of subjects recruited on Amazon Mechanical Turk that examines how religiously and scientifically framed messages about biodiversity loss influence a choice to make donations to protect against biodiversity loss. Subjects who received a religiously framed message were just as likely to make a donation as participants who read a control or scientifically framed message about biodiversity loss. In a subsample of Christians, the religiously framed message did not influence people to make a donation, compared to a control message, while a scientifically framed message increased the likelihood of making a donation. A religiously framed message increased donation amount in Christians, relative to a control message. Because there is a cost associated with biodiversity loss and protection, this research is important to determine how different message framing techniques promote action to prevent further biodiversity loss. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5357 |
Contains: | In: Worldviews
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685357-02203100 |