The Political Perfection of Original Judaism: Pedagogical Governance and Ecclesiastical Power in Mendelssohn's Jerusalem
Moses Mendelssohn famously penned his Jerusalem; or, On Religious Power and Judaism in response to a public challenge. Mendelssohn had declared ecclesiastical power to be a contradiction in terms, and had thus come out strongly against the use of coercion in religious life, and against the ban of...
| Published in: | Harvard theological review |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
| In: |
Harvard theological review
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Mendelssohn, Moses 1729-1786, Jerusalem oder über religiöse Macht und Judentum
/ Israel (Antiquity)
/ Judaism
/ Religious policy
/ Perfection
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AD Sociology of religion; religious policy BH Judaism HB Old Testament |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Moses Mendelssohn famously penned his Jerusalem; or, On Religious Power and Judaism in response to a public challenge. Mendelssohn had declared ecclesiastical power to be a contradiction in terms, and had thus come out strongly against the use of coercion in religious life, and against the ban of excommunication by rabbinic authorities, in particular. In the anonymously published The Search for Light and Right, August Cranz defies Mendelssohn to explain how he could reconcile this liberal view of religion with his continued commitment toand his insistence that Jews were still obligated to observeJewish law. As reasonable as all you say [about religious power] may be, to just that degree it contradicts the faith of your fathers . . . and the principles of its church . . . expressly set down in the books of Moses, Cranz argues. The theocratic ruling staff drove the whole people . . . with force and punishment. True, Cranz concedes, exile reduced the capacity of Jewish authorities to enforce Jewish law, but these ecclesiastical laws are there even if their exercise is no longer a must. Cranz challenges Mendelssohn to explain his apparently irreconcilable commitments: How can you persist in the faith of your fathers and shake the whole structure by clearing away its cornerstones, dear Mr. Mendelssohn, when you contest the ecclesiastical law given as divine revelation through Moses? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0017816015000127 |