Between Jewish Law and State Law: Rethinking Hermann Cohen's Critique of Spinoza

A reconsideration of the famous dispute between Cohen and Spinoza reveals surprising agreement on the very question on which dispute seems to center: how to evaluate philosophically the categories of religion and law. Cohen and Spinoza differ on the interpretation of Judaism, but theylargely agree t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Jewish studies quarterly
Main Author: Billet, Shira (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Mohr Siebeck [2018]
In: Jewish studies quarterly
Further subjects:B Halakha
B Ethics
B Philosophy of law
B religion of reason
B Tractatus theologico-politicus
B ROLE OF LAW
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:A reconsideration of the famous dispute between Cohen and Spinoza reveals surprising agreement on the very question on which dispute seems to center: how to evaluate philosophically the categories of religion and law. Cohen and Spinoza differ on the interpretation of Judaism, but theylargely agree that religious law is philosophically valuable only on the basis of its universal moral significance. Although Cohen both defends Judaism as a moral religion and elevates the role of law within his philosophical system, he does not offer a defense of Jewish law as such. LikeSpinoza, he distinguishes sharply between the philosophical value of religious law and political law. Recognizing these similarities between Spinoza and Cohen on law also illuminates Spinoza's more nuanced relationship to law than his naturalism and his critique of positive Jewish law oftensuggest. Cohen and Spinoza differ most not on Jewish law, but on the ultimate philosophical significance of political law.
ISSN:1868-6788
Contains:Enthalten in: Jewish studies quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1628/jsq-2018-0006