Between Jewish Law and State Law: Rethinking Hermann Cohen's Critique of Spinoza
A reconsideration of the famous dispute between Cohen and Spinoza reveals surprising agreement on the very question on which dispute seems to center: how to evaluate philosophically the categories of religion and law. Cohen and Spinoza differ on the interpretation of Judaism, but theylargely agree t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Mohr Siebeck
[2018]
|
| In: |
Jewish studies quarterly
Year: 2018, Volume: 25, Issue: 2, Pages: 139-170 |
| Further subjects: | B
Halakha
B Ethics B Philosophy of law B religion of reason B Tractatus theologico-politicus B ROLE OF LAW |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1583728562 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20181114174409.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181114s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1628/jsq-2018-0006 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1583728562 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)513728562 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ513728562 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Billet, Shira |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Between Jewish Law and State Law |b Rethinking Hermann Cohen's Critique of Spinoza |c Shira Billet |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A reconsideration of the famous dispute between Cohen and Spinoza reveals surprising agreement on the very question on which dispute seems to center: how to evaluate philosophically the categories of religion and law. Cohen and Spinoza differ on the interpretation of Judaism, but theylargely agree that religious law is philosophically valuable only on the basis of its universal moral significance. Although Cohen both defends Judaism as a moral religion and elevates the role of law within his philosophical system, he does not offer a defense of Jewish law as such. LikeSpinoza, he distinguishes sharply between the philosophical value of religious law and political law. Recognizing these similarities between Spinoza and Cohen on law also illuminates Spinoza's more nuanced relationship to law than his naturalism and his critique of positive Jewish law oftensuggest. Cohen and Spinoza differ most not on Jewish law, but on the ultimate philosophical significance of political law. | ||
| 601 | |a Cohen, Hermann | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Halakha | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a religion of reason | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ROLE OF LAW | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tractatus theologico-politicus | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Jewish studies quarterly |d Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 1993 |g 25(2018), 2, Seite 139-170 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)505950618 |w (DE-600)2216515-0 |w (DE-576)307015734 |x 1868-6788 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:139-170 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mohr/jsq/2018/00000025/00000002/art00004 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1628/jsq-2018-0006 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3032328985 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1583728562 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20181114174409 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 181114||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||