The Ambivalence of Scientific Naturalism: A Response to Mark Harris

Responding to Mark Harris, I reflect on his tantalizing question whether the provision of naturalistic explanations for biblical miracles renders the narratives more, or less, credible. I address his “reversal,” in which professional scientists now feature among defenders of a literalistic reading,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:MODERN SCIENCE AND BIBLICAL MIRACLES: THE BOYLE LECTURE 2018
Main Author: Brooke, John Hedley 1944- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- [2018]
In: Zygon
Year: 2018, Volume: 53, Issue: 4, Pages: 1051-1056
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bible / Hermeneutics / Miracle / Explanation / Naturalism (Philosophy) / Natural sciences
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
HA Bible
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Resurrection
B catastrophism
B Geology
B Miracles
B Biblical Studies
B Naturalism
B Natural Theology
B Secularism
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Responding to Mark Harris, I reflect on his tantalizing question whether the provision of naturalistic explanations for biblical miracles renders the narratives more, or less, credible. I address his “reversal,” in which professional scientists now feature among defenders of a literalistic reading, while professional biblical scholars are often skeptical. I suggest this underlines the ambivalence of scientific naturalism from the standpoint of Christian theology. Historical examples are adduced to show that, until the mid-nineteenth century, naturalistic and theistic explanations were commonly regarded as complementary. Accordingly, the primacy often accorded to scientific progress in accounts of secularization is questionable. Two concluding questions are raised. If a methodological naturalism inheres in biblical scholarship, as in the sciences, how do biblical scholars decide whether the historical trajectories they construct for the composition of biblical texts are destructive or affirmative of faith? Second, when the miracle is the Resurrection of the dead Christ, does not the scientific impossibility of this foundational event remain sacrosanct?
ISSN:1467-9744
Reference:Kritik von "Apocalypses Now (2018)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12463